Understanding Cost-In-Use versus Cost per Pound

A key factor that contributes to the cost of natural colors in a final product formulation is the usage rate. Thus, the most effective approach to cost analysis of two or more solutions would be cost-in-use comparisons, versus cost/lb. The potential variation in pigment concentration amongst botanicals used for color solutions greatly impacts cost-in-use.


For example, a product developer might be trialing black carrot color solutions from two different suppliers whose black carrot sources vary in pigment concentration. The solution from the more concentrated botanical typically equates to a lower usage level and might have a much lower impact on total formulation cost.

While the cost per pound could seem high, you really need to calculate the cost-in-use to know which color is most efficient.

Concentration is not specific to the color industry, there are many other fields that focus on higher strength products, including:


The message of concentrated products is generally similar, “a little goes a long way,” and this result is exactly what Sensient’s agronomy team is working on with our botanicals for color—natural color, more for less.

Watch this video to learn more:

Sensient is making great strides in developing botanical sources with higher pigment levels. Our efforts will continue to improve over time.

Interested in trialing our new portfolio of highly concentrated natural food colors?


Related Posts

Mothers Know Best: How Moms are Influencing the Food and Beverage Industry

Rubio’s Fast-Casual Fresh Mex Restaurant Removes Caramel Coloring

How Big Food is Taking on a World of Picky Eaters

Kraft Heinz Doubles Oscar Mayer’s Marketing Budget to Promote Natural Ingredients

The Magically Colorful Unicorn Trend

Caribou Coffee Cutting Artificial and Caramel Coloring from Beverages

A Colorful Twist on a Sweet & Salty Snack

Food Color Effect on Older Consumers

Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins Removing Artificial Colors by End of 2018

Food Color is as Important as Taste

California Introduces “Warning Label” Bill for Foods Containing Artificial Dyes

Myth or Fact? Artificially-Colored Foods Are Bad for You

Further Concerns Over the Safety of Titanium Dioxide

Panera is 100% Additive-Free

Formulators Taking Solution-Approach to Natural

Consumers Emphasizing Ingredients on Food Labels

#TBT A Look Back at the Co-Creation of the Food Coloring Business

8 Foods You Would Never Guess Were Artificially Colored

Color of Food Guides our Brains

Naturally Coloring the Beverage Industry

Are Autumn Leaves the Next Source of Natural Color?

Food Colors Market to Reach $3.75 Billion by 2022

Spirulina Algae: Next Natural Food Trend

Why Blue Foods Are Perceived Less Natural

Big Brands Clean Up Portfolios for Consumers

Natural Colors Linked to Positive Health Effects

Many Food Companies are Cooking Up New Natural Recipes

SweeTARTS Launches Five New Custom Colored Gummies Shaped as School Mascots

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Continues Research on the Safety of Titanium Dioxide

A Deep Look into Spirulina: an Emerging and Popular Natural Color Source

Does Mac&Cheese Lead the ‘Free-From’ Trend?

Why Wegmans Removed Artificial Colors in their Icings

Food Companies Are Not Phasing Out Artificial Colors Fast Enough for Some

Heinz Removing Artificial Colors from Pickles

Kraft Launching Jell-O Line Without Artificial Colors

McDonald’s Removing Artificial Colors from Iconic Chicken Nuggets

Natural Colors ‘Upsurge’ in 2016 Market Share

Consumers Are Influenced by the Color of their Food